Remembering the 1995 Srebrenica Massacre

07.13.14
via Youtube
World News /13 Jul 2014
07.13.14

Remembering the 1995 Srebrenica Massacre

Every year in July, the memories of the Srebrenica Massacre swell anew and bring tears to not just Bosniaks but anyone who has even an ounce of humanity left in him/her. Years go by, debates keep happening, and we keep telling ourselves that humanity is not yet dead. Between 1992 and 1995, over 100,000 innocent civilians of Bosnia lost their lives. In the town of Srebrenica, nearly 8,000 Muslims were massacred between July 11 and 13 in the year 1995.

Yes, Srebrenica was a protected UN Safe Area. There was a Dutch peacekeeping force stationed in the region and their job was to protect the refugees in and around Srebrenica. Needless to say, the peacekeepers failed. This massacre, unarguably the worst one ever witnessed by Europe after the Second World War, was carried out by the Serbian terror forces under the command of General Ratko Mladic. The victims were shot and dumped in mass graves, thereby making identification very difficult.

Thus far, the International Commission on Missing Persons (ICMP) has identified nearly 6,500 victims of the Srebrenica Massacre. Certain videos have surfaced, which show the atrocities committed by Mladic’s men. Here is one such video (warning: it contains very graphic scenes of violence).

The Dutch peacekeeping forces too failed to impress. To quote General John Sheehan, the then NATO’s Supreme Commander: “The case in point that I’m referring to is when the Dutch were required to defend Srebrenica against the Serbs. The battalion was under-strength, poorly led, and the Serbs came into town, handcuffed the soldiers to telephone poles, marched the Muslims off, and executed them. That was the largest massacre in Europe since World War Two.”

The events of Srebrenica were not riots. Nor were they a two-sided conflict. It was sheer genocide, as noted by both the International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia as well as the International Court of Justice: “By seeking to eliminate a part of the Bosnian Muslims, the Bosnian Serb forces committed genocide. They targeted for extinction the 40,000 Bosnian Muslims living in Srebrenica, a group which was emblematic of Bosnian Muslims in general. The Appeals Chamber states unequivocally that the law condemns, in appropriate terms, the deep and lasting injury inflicted, and calls the massacre at Srebrenica by its proper name: genocide. Those responsible will bear this stigma, and it will serve as a warning to those who may in future contemplate the commission of such a heinous act.”

The two main villains of the Srebrenica Genocide are still on trial in The Hague: the former President of the Republika Srpska, Radovan Karadzic, and the General of the army of the Republika Srpska, Ratko Mladic. However, the hatred is still alive. During the course of the trial, Colonel Luka Dragicevic stated in his testimony that he had no remorse for the 1995 events, and he felt that “Serbians are genetically stronger, better, more beautiful and smarter” as compared to Bosnians.

Such blatant racism is just the tip of the iceberg. Karadzic’s daughter, Sonja Karadzic-Jovicevic, recently announced that she will run in the upcoming October parliamentary elections of Republika Srpska. She openly denies allegations of genocide, questions the authority of The International Court in The Hague, and puts forth a sectarian ideology. It is also noteworthy that Radovan Karadzic is being viewed as a war hero (not a war criminal).

Furthermore, the Republika Srpska has granted over $1m from its government budget to a NGO (owned and operated by a Serbian lawyer named Stephen Karganovic) that intends to present a one-sided and false account of the Srebrenica Massacre. Quite obviously, denial and the perversion of history is an acceptable task for the Republika Srpska.

1995 is long gone, but the scars of the tragedy are still fresh. Serbian government aspires to join the EU. However, it needs to realize that its agenda of “intended indifference” towards crimes of yesterday is not the right road to be on.

People in Republika Srpska need to realize that their leaders — be it the previous President Radovan Karadzic, his daughter Sonja Karadzic-Jovicevic, or the current President Milorad Dodik — need to be replaced. Nationalism is acceptable, but ultranationalism serves no fruitful purpose.

On the other hand, the Bosniaks too need to develop a conscious willingness to work together. Having suffered the ill-effects of war and witnessed a full-fledged genocide, most Bosniaks are undergoing a sort of existential crisis. After all, absence of violence does not mean absence of fear. Bosniaks need to realize that their struggle for justice is far from over and find the strength to aspire for a glorious future.

The horrid flashbacks of 1995 can fade only when there is hope for regional cooperation and harmony. Until then, even if the ICC were to pronounce its verdict and punish the culprits, the sad episodes of Srebrenica will linger on in memory.

  • The Trans-Tasman Spat Show: New Zealand-Australian Tensions

  • How the U.S. Government is Enabling the Saudi Embargo of Qatar

  • Trump’s Iran Deal

  • Forecast Gives Xi Clear Skies Ahead

  • On Trump, Afghanistan, and the Plunder Doctrine

  • Javad Zarif’s “Sophisticated” Plan to Influence American Voters and Policy Makers

  • Dirty Ties: The University of New Haven and Saudi Arabia

  • Climate Changed

  • Leprechauns, Nazis and Truncheons

  • Words, Numbers, and Values: Why an Anti-refugee Stance Doesn’t Add Up

  • When it Comes to Fair Trade, the Menu isn’t à la Carte

  • How to Change the Way We Talk about Women’s Health Care