The Platform
Latest Articles
by Shovkat Shamuratov
by Syed Hamza Mahroof
by Gordon Feller
by Manish Rai
by Mohammad Ibrahim Fheili
by Arees Khan Mangi
by Rupa Kumari
by Amro Shubair
by James Carlini
by Shovkat Shamuratov
by Syed Hamza Mahroof
by Gordon Feller
by Manish Rai
by Mohammad Ibrahim Fheili
by Arees Khan Mangi
by Rupa Kumari
by Amro Shubair
by James Carlini
The Remaking of Saudi Foreign Policy
Saudi Arabia is recalibrating its foreign policy by balancing economic diversification with competing U.S. and Chinese strategic ties.
Saudi Arabia is the only Arab country represented in the G20, and foreign aid has long served as a central instrument of its diplomacy. For more than half a century, the Kingdom has pursued its security interests through aid, leveraging its economic capacity to shape regional and international outcomes. Saudi Arabia also occupies multiple and sometimes overlapping identities: it is the world’s foremost energy power, the custodian of Islam’s two holiest sites—Mecca and Medina—and an increasingly consequential actor in global affairs. Its influence extends well beyond the Middle East, shaping economic, political, and strategic debates worldwide.
Yet this prominence has not insulated the Kingdom from economic vulnerability. Saudi Arabia has faced persistent challenges stemming from a turbulent regional economic environment and its heavy reliance on a narrow energy base, with oil accounting for nearly all national revenues. Although the dramatic rise in oil prices from the early 2000s through roughly 2013 improved living standards and state capacity, an oil-dependent economy cannot fully shield the country from financial and economic shocks. This raises a central question: how can Saudi Arabia balance economic diplomacy with strategic statecraft, and what costs might it incur in doing so?
Vision 2030, launched in 2016, represents the Kingdom’s most ambitious attempt to confront this vulnerability. Designed to promote economic diversification and long-term sustainability, the initiative aims to raise the share of non-oil GDP to roughly 50 percent. Nearly a decade into its implementation, official assessments suggest notable progress. According to the 2024 Annual Report, approximately 85 percent of Vision 2030 initiatives have either been completed or are underway.
Among the agreements pursued in 2025 under this framework, the Pakistan–Saudi defense pact stands out for its strategic importance. By addressing the security imperatives of Vision 2030, the partnership underscores the increasingly intertwined nature of economic transformation and hard security. Having a nuclear-armed partner in its strategic orbit strengthens regional deterrence and may also support Saudi Arabia’s longer-term economic ambitions. Relations between Pakistan and Saudi Arabia have likewise been shaped by modern free-market dynamics, as both countries seek expanded market access and mutual economic advantage.
These dynamics are evident in the growing economic relationship between Riyadh and Islamabad. During a recent meeting in Riyadh, the two governments launched an economic cooperation framework on October 27, grounded in shared economic interests and aimed at deepening trade and investment ties. The framework emphasizes cooperation across economic, investment, and developmental sectors, with major projects intended to enhance private-sector engagement and boost bilateral trade. In this sense, the post-2008 shift from geopolitics to geo-economics has reshaped Pakistan–Saudi relations, anchoring them in neoliberal principles of economic interdependence. For long-term stability and the maximization of mutual gains, geo-economic strategies are likely to remain central.
At the same time, Saudi Arabia has actively deepened its relationship with China as part of its Vision 2030 ambitions. Cooperation now spans infrastructure development, energy trade, defense, and technology. Roughly 40 percent of Saudi crude oil exports flow to China, underscoring the economic weight of the relationship.
Yet this growing partnership exists alongside a long-standing reliance on the United States as the Kingdom’s primary security guarantor—a role that has proven difficult to replace. China has at times sought to present itself as an alternative partner, but the limits of this approach were exposed during the 2019 attacks on Saudi Aramco facilities. Despite substantial Chinese investment, the United States provided critical intelligence and defensive support. Overreliance on China, moreover, risks creating strategic dependencies that could undermine Saudi Arabia’s economic sovereignty.
A critical assessment of Saudi Arabia’s position reveals both achievement and risk. Diversifying economic ties and cultivating positive relations with multiple major powers are significant accomplishments. Yet maintaining equilibrium amid intensifying U.S.–China rivalry carries real diplomatic hazards. Washington has increasingly pressured allies to limit Chinese influence, particularly in sensitive areas such as 5G technology. At the same time, Saudi openness to firms like Huawei raises questions about the Kingdom’s ability to remain neutral in the technological domain. Similarly, reports in 2021 of Saudi–Chinese cooperation in missile manufacturing heightened U.S. concerns and cast doubt on American security commitments.
These tensions are unlikely to dissipate. Saudi Arabia’s challenge will be to navigate them without eroding its credibility or strategic autonomy. Beyond Vision 2030, the Kingdom will need a broader, long-term strategic framework—one that ensures security while enabling deeper, more diversified economic engagement. Ultimately, the success of Saudi Arabia’s evolving foreign policy will depend on its ability to maximize geopolitical leverage without becoming trapped between competing great powers.
Syed Hamza Mahroof is an International Relations graduate from the University of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Muzaffarabad, and a research intern at the Center for International Strategic Studies (AJK). His work focuses on South Asia’s geoeconomic and political dynamics, with an emphasis on economic diplomacy and shifting power structures.