Jurica Koletić/Unsplash

A Tyranny of Code: Why Britain Must Finally Proscribe the IRGC

The world has always had its malefactors — tyrants, ideologues, inquisitors, fanatics. Once they wore jackboots and epaulettes; now they wield USB sticks, run Telegram channels, and write code from the shadows of dimly lit basements. If George Orwell were alive today, he would not find Big Brother in the Ministry of Truth, but crouched behind the firewalls of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps — the IRGC — a force as chilling as it is consistently underestimated.

Let me be clear: I am not — nor have I ever claimed to be — a spook, a statesman, or a cyber warrior. I come to this only as a citizen, a reader of public records, a thinker of thoughts. And I believe it is time we in Britain confronted one of the most quietly dangerous threats to our national security, civic integrity, and indeed our collective sanity: the IRGC.

A recent report from the Forum for Foreign Relations (“The IRGC’s Cyber Threat to the United Kingdom”) lays out this danger with surgical clarity. “The IRGC,” it states, “has evolved into one of the world’s most dangerous cyber actors…waging a hybrid war that fuses digital sabotage with ideological subversion, and the United Kingdom has become one of its prime targets.” One reads that and pictures battalions of keyboard zealots — and that image wouldn’t be far off.

In 2022, the Director General of MI5 declared that Iran had plotted “at least ten abductions or assassinations on UK soil” within a single year — a claim that, in any other decade, would have dominated the front pages for weeks. As the report makes clear, “much of this stems from the IRGC, which controls Iran’s intelligence apparatus and deploys both online and offline operatives.” They are, to put it plainly, both the puppet and the puppeteer.

Perhaps you think this is the business of diplomats and data analysts. But the IRGC’s reach extends beyond GCHQ’s servers or the encrypted phones in Whitehall. It has insinuated itself into our neighborhoods. The report details how the IRGC exploits “a network of religious centres, media outlets, social campaigns and covert online influence” to infiltrate British Arab and Muslim communities, pushing “sectarian propaganda and extremist Islamist ideology loyal to Iran’s Supreme Leader.” They are not merely phishing for passwords — they are fishing for souls.

Among the most disturbing manifestations of this ideological incursion came, remarkably, in the form of a music video. Yes, music — that ancient unifier of humanity, that salve for collective wounds. Except here, it was twisted into a tool of indoctrination. In 2022, the IRGC-linked anthem “Salute Commander” — a rousing number pledging allegiance to the 12th Imam and to martyrdom — was filmed not in Iran, but here in the UK. The location? The Iranian Embassy’s school and the Islamic Centre of England, both in London. The footage captures British children singing with haunting solemnity: “Do not see me as too young…I’ll answer the call.”

That is not a cultural celebration. It is not religious education. It is, unmistakably, propaganda targeted at children.

The report raises yet another deeply unsettling point — and those with gentle temperaments may wish to brace themselves: IRGC-affiliated hackers “penetrated British parliamentary email accounts…and unleashed propaganda networks to subvert and radicalise.” It is difficult to write that sentence without blinking in disbelief. Parliament — the very heart of British democracy — infiltrated not by amateurs or mischief-makers, but by a state-backed military-intelligence apparatus committed to a global Khomeinist revolution.

So why, you may wonder, has the British government still not designated the IRGC as a terrorist organisation? The United States has. British intelligence has publicly detailed the scope of the threat. The answer, it seems, lies somewhere in the Bermuda Triangle of bureaucratic inertia, diplomatic hesitation, and political squeamishness. But the moment for hesitation, as the report rightly argues, has surely passed.

The case is laid out in no uncertain terms: “The IRGC’s growing cyber arsenal is now a central pillar of Iran’s strategy to project power beyond its borders while protecting the regime at home.” It employs cyber-espionage not just to gather intelligence, but to monitor dissidents, surveil journalists, and harass anyone deemed “of interest” to the regime. And when it’s not spying, it’s corrupting Britain’s civic sphere — sowing discord, radicalising the vulnerable, and infecting the social fabric with imported extremism.

It is long past time — indeed, it is overdue — for the British government to proscribe the IRGC in its entirety. Not just the al-Quds Force, not just its visible offshoots and front organisations, but the full apparatus. To fail to act is to send a signal that hostile actors may surveil, destabilise, and indoctrinate within our borders — and do so with impunity.

Of course, some fear that proscription might alienate British-Iranian communities. But this concern, while understandable, is ultimately misplaced. The first and greatest victims of the IRGC are Iranians themselves — dissidents, reformists, journalists, women, and activists who have fled its repression only to find its agents watching them in exile. To proscribe the IRGC is not to target a people. It is to defend pluralism, liberty, and the promise of sanctuary that Britain purports to offer.

This is not alarmism. It is realism. We cannot wait for a cyber 9/11, or for some homegrown act of martyrdom, to rouse us from complacency. The warning signs are not subtle. The facts are not in dispute. The threat is not remote. What’s needed now is courage — the civic courage to act in defence of democratic integrity.

The IRGC is not some theoretical menace lurking on the horizon. It is already here — in our schools, in our inboxes, in our communities. It is no longer knocking at Britain’s door.

It is inside the hallway, checking the locks.