Andrea Hanks

World News


Ignorance, Delusion, Denial, and Unpreparedness

President Trump and his administration’s response to COVID-19 has been abysmal, crafting a narrative that has revealed a warped reality based on a combination of ignorance, delusion, denial, and a lack of preparedness. Trump has displayed utter ignorance – especially in the early days of the outbreak, stating in February that there were about 15 cases in the U.S., the result of a single traveler from China, and that the number of infected individuals would soon dwindle down to zero. Only someone completely divorced from the reality of the virus would have uttered such an imbecilic statement. It was then that Americans truly understood just how ill-prepared he was to navigate the country through the crisis.

Messaging out of the White House has been an absolute disaster, starting with the president and trickling down to the various cabinet members, department heads, and other sources of information at the federal level. Delusion on the president’s part, misinformation (whether deliberate or otherwise) from other federal officials, a preoccupation with political correctness, and a predilection to pander to the president’s political base had combined to create a muddled, discombobulated mess in response to the virus.

It didn’t take long for many of America’s governors, mayors, and corporate CEOs to realize that they would not be gaining any divine guidance from the Trump administration about what to do, or when to do it, in response to the virus. While, by March, most of the nation’s governors had issued stay at home orders, an astonishing number of governors have still failed to do so – three months after the first cases became apparent in the U.S. Yet, in every case, those lockdown orders have been voluntary, since there is no way to actually enforce them. Unlike in China, the sanctity of governmental decrees are dependent upon citizens’ willingness to comply. Fortunately, most Americans understand what is at stake and have stayed home.

As bad as the government’s messaging has been, its level of preparedness for a pandemic has been atrocious. Despite the fact that several prior administrations (from Bush to Obama and through to Trump) had plans in place to address a pandemic or bioterrorism event, based on its response to an actual pandemic, the American government appears to have never contemplated the issue prior to the arrival of COVID-19.

For example, in 2004, Bush had signed into law Project BioShield, to protect Americans against biological, chemical, radiological, or nuclear attack. It had allocated $5.6 billion over 10 years for countermeasures against anthrax, smallpox, and other chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear agents. Development of medical countermeasures had been accelerated by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), a national network of regional Centers of Excellence for Biodefense were established, and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was supposed to make treatments speedily available in emergency situations. Yet the NIH, FDA, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Health and Human Services, and a host of other government agencies failed to communicate, collaborate, or respond effectively.

In 2015, government scientists estimated that a severe flu outbreak infecting 20 to 30 percent of the U.S. population would require at least 1.7 billion N95 respirator masks. In 2006, Congress provided supplemental funds to add 104 million N95 masks and 52 million surgical masks in an effort to prepare for a flu pandemic. However, following the H1N1 influenza outbreak in 2009 under Obama – which triggered a nationwide shortage of masks and caused a two- to three-year backlog orders for the N95s – the stockpile distributed about three-quarters of its inventory but failed to rebuild the supply. The U.S. continued to rely on foreign sources of supply of personal protective equipment for much of its needs, as well as an over-reliance on foreign sources of critical drugs.

Also in 2015, a Bipartisan Commission on Biodefense produced more than 30 recommendations for what the U.S. government should do to become better prepared for biological threats. In 2016, the Commission received a grant of just $1.3 million from a non-governmental organization (NGO) to continue its work, and in 2018, $2.5 million more from the same NGO. It did not receive official U.S. government financial support and the government failed to follow through on virtually any of the recommendations made by the Commission – an indication of the continued lack of focus on the subject.

Shortly after taking office in 2017, Trump disbanded the White House’s National Security Council Directorate for Global Health Security and Biodefense – an important link in the national preparedness chain. In 2018, the Trump administration did commence a National Biodefense Strategy designed to enhance national biodefense capabilities. It established a governance structure composed of federal agencies to collect and assess data on their biodefense activities and identify gaps. But the U.S. Government Accountability Office found that there were no clear or detailed processes for joint decision-making, including how agencies would identify opportunities to leverage resources, or who would make and enforce decisions. It concluded that in the absence of clearly documented methods for enterprise-wide decision-making the effort ran the risk of failing to adopt a strategic enterprise-wide approach that would meaningfully enhance national defense capabilities.

Contrary to the attempted launch of the Strategy, the Trump administration’s repeated calls to cut the budget for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the NIH, and other public health agencies made it evident that the ability to respond to pandemics was clearly not going to be a priority. His administration certainly contributed to the deficient American response to the virus, but in truth, successive American administrations have failed in unison to adequately prepare for such a calamity.

One would presume that the government will do a better job of preparing for future pandemics, but if the actions taken following successive cyberattacks against the U.S. government are any indication, the response is likely to be lackluster and underfunded. It appears that only when the American people demand a meaningful response from their elected representatives will this issue be given the attention, funding, and resources it deserves.

This article was originally posted in Fair Observer.