Israel is committing not only human genocide but also environmental genocide. The loss of life in Gaza raises urgent concerns about human rights, but the relentless bombings are also unleashing catastrophic consequences for the planet. The 75,000 tonnes of bombs dropped in Gaza exacerbate carbon dioxide emissions and pollute the atmosphere. Yet, nations remain conspicuously silent about Israel’s environmental destruction.

The United Nations and the International Court of Justice (ICJ) must take decisive action by imposing hefty fines on countries that breach environmental agreements like the Paris Climate Accord. Ambassadors from the United Nations Environment Assembly should closely monitor the environmental conduct of member states, reporting violations to the ICJ. Granting the ICJ the authority to levy fines could compel nations like Israel to comply, creating an incentive to resolve conflicts through diplomacy rather than destruction.

The humanitarian toll of ongoing bombings is devastating for Palestinians. Israel has denied Palestinians the dignity of properly burying their dead, leading to the spread of disease through contaminated soil and water. In Gaza, where 95 percent of the population lacks access to clean water, diseases like cholera are proliferating. The health impacts are further compounded by bombs containing white phosphorus and other toxic substances, leaving Gazans to endure long-term health consequences.

Palestine’s recovery seems a distant prospect. Once renowned for its lush olive groves, watermelon patches, and agricultural vibrancy, the region has been scarred by relentless bombing and bulldozing by Israeli forces. The aftermath of such destruction leaves land unsuitable for farming, as chemical contaminants in the soil and water resist easy remediation, threatening public health for generations.

Financial penalties for environmental violations could have a transformative impact. Such fines would ensure accountability and force nations to honor their international commitments. Israel, for instance, is a signatory to the Paris Climate Accord and the 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda, yet its actions betray these pledges. Monetary consequences would deter similar violations in the future and encourage nations to prioritize diplomacy over ecological harm.

These fines could also provide a tangible benefit. The collected funds should be directed toward sustainable development projects. For example, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) collaborates on numerous initiatives to promote ethical and sustainable development. Resources obtained from Israel’s penalties could help rebuild Gaza, restore livable conditions, and offer Palestinians hope for a better future.

Critics may argue that international law lacks enforceability. Nations often resist the authority of global institutions like the ICJ, fearing an erosion of sovereignty. Yet, the broader goal of this expanded jurisdiction would be to encourage nations to improve their environmental practices. While Israel is a prominent example, other high-emission countries—including the United States, Russia, China, and India—must also recognize that ecological damage carries consequences. Trade sanctions and arms embargoes could further discourage environmental atrocities. For Israel specifically, suspending partnerships and deals with allies like the United States could push for a sustainable resolution to the Israel-Palestine conflict.

Environmental genocide is unfolding in Gaza. It is imperative for the ICJ and the United Nations to confront this crisis by imposing stringent penalties on nations that flout international agreements. Holding Israel accountable is not just about justice for Palestine; it is a call to protect our shared planet. The global community must act with urgency. Bold and assertive measures today can pave the way for a sustainable and equitable tomorrow.