The Platform
Latest Articles
by Akbar Sapie
by Wajahat Kazmi
by Mohammad Ibrahim Fheili
by Punsara Amarasinghe
by Manish Rai
by Mirza Abdul Aleem Baig
by Mohammad Ibrahim Fheili
by Akbar Sapie
by Wajahat Kazmi
by Mohammad Ibrahim Fheili
by Punsara Amarasinghe
by Manish Rai
by Mirza Abdul Aleem Baig
by Mohammad Ibrahim Fheili
Bye-Bye Angel Tax! Bidding Farewell to India’s Burdensome Taxation Regime for Entrepreneurs
The Indian government has abolished the angel tax, removing a significant barrier to startup investments and boosting the entrepreneurial ecosystem.
Last year, I delved into the burdensome angel tax regime that stifled entrepreneurs in India, clipping the wings of aspiring business minds before they could soar. Now, with the Indian government’s recent decision to abolish this draconian law, it feels timely to revisit the topic.
Previously, I explored how the angel tax was embedded in Section 56(2)(viib) of the Income Tax Act of 1961, as amended by the Finance Act of 2012. This provision taxed the overvaluation of shares during early funding rounds of startups. The Finance Act of 2023 exacerbated the already flawed system by extending the angel tax to foreign investments. However, in a welcome turn of events, Indian Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, during the presentation of the Budget for 2024-25, announced the abolition of the angel tax for all investors. This marks the end of a poorly conceived regulation introduced in 2012 under the guise of combating black money.
To clarify, the Angel Tax was a levy on the capital that startups received from angel investors, particularly when the investment exceeded the fair market value of the company’s shares. Typically, these investors are affluent individuals, or “high net-worth individuals (HNIs),” who channel their personal funds into startups or small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Introduced in India in 2012, the tax aimed to prevent money laundering through investments in unlisted companies with inflated valuations. The discrepancy between the amount invested and the fair market value was treated as taxable income.
In layman’s terms, if an HNI invested $120,000 in a fledgling company with minimal revenue, but tax authorities valued the company at only $12,000, the startup would be taxed on the difference. This forced startups to justify their valuations, despite the challenges traditional valuation methods pose for cash-flow-negative enterprises.
In recent years, startups have raised significant concerns about the angel tax, describing it as excessively harsh and unfair. They contend that determining the fair market value of a startup is impractical, especially when Assessing Officers (AOs) often rely on discounted cash flow methods that seem to favor tax authorities. Startups have reported receiving tax notices for investments made years prior, with combined taxes and penalties sometimes exceeding the original funding amount. At the height of the controversy in 2019, a survey by LocalCircles revealed that over 73 percent of Indian startups that had raised capital ranging from $60,000 to $239,000 received angel tax notices from the Income Tax Department.
Moreover, this tax has posed significant challenges for startups, as early-stage investments are often based on future potential rather than current value. This discrepancy made justifying valuations difficult, potentially leading to substantial tax liabilities that could stymie growth and discourage investment.
While there were methods to navigate these issues, such as filing with the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT), the process was fraught with difficulties. The requirement for fair market value certifications from registered investment bankers was particularly burdensome and costly, compounded by the unreliability of government portals. This created significant friction, dissuading many potential angel investors from backing new ventures.
In response to mounting pressure from venture capitalists and industry experts, there has been a strong push to eliminate the angel tax and foster a more supportive environment for startups in India. Thankfully, these demands were not only heard but acted upon. The removal of this onerous regulation has provided a much-needed boost to startup investments, innovation, and entrepreneurship across the country. Abolishing this tax will enable investors to focus on their ventures without the constant worry of tax implications.
Additionally, the enhancement of Mudra loans from $12,000 to $24,000 is another promising development. The Mudra scheme aims to support income-generating micro-enterprises across various sectors, including manufacturing, trading, services, and allied agricultural activities. Together, these measures—abolishing the angel tax and increasing Mudra loan limits—promise to significantly boost startups, creating a more conducive environment for entrepreneurship and economic growth in India.
Tejaswini Kaushal is studying law at the Dr. Ram Manohar Lohiya National Law University, in Lucknow, India. She is keenly interested in international, corporate, tech, and intellectual property law. With a penchant for conducting in-depth analyses and critically scrutinizing complex legal issues, she has a track record of publishing well-received content on recognized websites, aiming to make a positive impact on society through her work.