Provided by the author

World News

/

Riyadh’s Grip on Southern Yemen Is Slipping

Saudi Arabia has spent years cultivating influence in southern Yemen, backing forces opposed to the Houthis while trying to manage the rival ambitions of the separatists fighting alongside them. Over the weekend, tens of thousands of people gathered in Aden, Mukalla, and Seiyun in a show of political strength that suggested the Southern Transitional Council (STC) still commands substantial support across the south.

The STC seeks to restore an independent southern state, which existed from 1967 until unification with northern Yemen in 1990. Despite punishing temperatures that exceeded 44°C in some areas, demonstrators carried the flag of the former South Yemen and portraits of STC President Aidarus al-Zoubaidi.

Their chants and slogans were aimed not at the Houthis in the north, but at Saudi policies and what many participants described as foreign interference in southern affairs. Across all three cities, demonstrators reaffirmed their support for the STC and its leadership, presenting the movement as the principal political vehicle for southern aspirations.

The relationship between the STC and Saudi Arabia has long combined tactical cooperation with strategic tension. Both are aligned within the broader anti-Houthi coalition, but their visions for Yemen’s future diverge sharply. Riyadh formally supports a unified Yemeni state; the STC seeks to dismantle that union. The rallies brought this contradiction into public view, demonstrating how closely support for the STC remains bound to a distinct southern political identity.

Protests across southern Yemen
(Images provided by the author)

It would therefore be a mistake to dismiss the demonstrations as routine political theater. Mobilizing large crowds simultaneously in three major cities requires a degree of organization and coordination that few political movements in Yemen can currently muster. For STC supporters, the rallies were proof that the movement can still bring people into the streets despite economic hardship, persistent insecurity, and mounting political pressure.

According to local reports, security forces imposed restrictions in some areas, including closing roads leading to gathering sites in Aden and Seiyun. Other reports suggested that officials tried to limit access to the demonstrations. Participants nevertheless continued to arrive throughout the day. If anything, the reported obstacles appeared to harden their determination to be seen and heard.

The importance of the rallies lies not only in their size, but in what they reveal about southern Yemen’s political landscape. For years, arguments over the south’s future have competed with the more immediate demands of war, weak governance, and economic survival. Yet the weekend’s demonstrations showed that political representation and self-determination continue to resonate with large sections of the southern population.

The crowds should not be treated as a referendum, and street mobilization does not by itself establish the breadth of support for independence. But the rallies do complicate any assumption that the southern question can be deferred until the war with the Houthis is resolved. The issue is not a peripheral dispute within the anti-Houthi camp; it is one of the central questions any postwar settlement will have to confront.

Neither Riyadh nor Yemen’s internationally recognized government has publicly responded to the demonstrations. That silence may prove temporary. The rallies delivered a message extending far beyond the gathering sites: Support for the STC remains visible, organized, and capable of being expressed on a significant scale, including in direct opposition to Saudi policy.

Whatever one’s view of southern independence, the demonstrations were a reminder that the STC remains a formidable political actor. They also exposed the limits of Saudi influence. Riyadh can broker agreements, finance allies, and shape the anti-Houthi coalition, but it cannot simply erase southern aspirations or dictate the terms on which they are expressed. Any durable political settlement will have to accommodate both those aspirations and the movement that has positioned itself as their most powerful champion.